Okay, well a commenter made a good point that I wasn’t doing a good job at articulating my positions. I will use this post to give reasons for some of my positions. If you don’t find them strong enough to convince you that is fine.
Position #1 – Obama is lying about healthcare.
More recently Obama has been talking about a public option and that it is not a Trojan horse for a single payer system. In my post about this it shows hims specifically saying that he is a proponent of a single payer health plan. In another clip he says that you won’t be able to get to single payer immediately and that it might take 10, 15 or 20 years.
The administration simply calls stuff floating around the internet “disinformation” but it doesn’t go into it at all and they just show speeches from Obama more recently.
Position #2 – Fluoride should not be added to the water supply.
Whether it is healthy or not IS debatable and the choice on whether to consume it or not should be the individuals.
I don’t think it is the role of government and is just one more thing the tax payer shouldn’t be burdened with.
Position #3 – On 9/11 controlled demolition took down the twin towers and building 7.
The buildings fell at free fall speed just like in controlled demolition. I don’t see how a building that strong would have no resistance on the way down what so ever.
All three buildings fell the same way.
I don’t know of any other building in history that has ever collapsed at free fall speed from random fires (building 7).
The building material was pulverized into dust.
Over 700 people in a group called Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth believe it could only be controlled demolition.
The reasons in the video in my post about 911 make sense to me. They refer to this as false flag terrorism and state that is is not a new precedent but, in fact, routine when you look at history. It is also stated that in the government’s document called “Project for a New American Century” they state that they want to invade Iraq and Afghanistan to control the oil supplies and that the American people won’t stand for that and they will need something like a new pearl harbor as an excuse. It seemed to have worked.
Position #4 – We are going to see a drastic reduction in the value of the dollar soon.
When you print money you devalue it. Creating money does not create addition purchasing power, wealth or prosperity. From August 2008 to May of 2009 we doubled the monetary base (the most liquid part of the money supply). I don’t believe there has been any other time in US history where so much money has been created in so little time.
Peter Schiff called the current collapse and has the same position.
Mark Faber believe that hyperinflation for the US is a 100% possibility. I don’t agree on the percentage but it is just one more respected investor/economist with a similar position.
Jim Rogers is another investor who agrees.
August 17th, 2009 at 7:09 am
I was just using “Health Care” because it seems to be the most commonly referred to phrase when talking about the matter. I wasn’t trying to carry extra meaning with it.
How do you know how the 9/11 truth engineers came to their conclusion? To me it seems like that could be true of the other side. Scientists may have been told something like: Ok a plane hit a building and caused fires. How could this cause the building to collapse?
What makes the main stream experts throw out the idea of controlled demolition?
I would very much be interested in a single historical example of random fires causing a steel building to totally collapse at all let alone at free fall speed.
How can that happen exactly the same way at free fall speed 3 times in one day and never before?
I have heard both monetary supply and monetary base used but I will fix it as you are technically right.
August 20th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/01/stephen-colbert-rips-apar_n_181673.html
August 20th, 2009 at 3:12 pm
Yea, Glen is a little crazy.
September 1st, 2009 at 8:07 am
@Andrew
I think you might be changing my position.
There are still other questions though.
What about the points made by this video? Are they simply made up?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMNim2FUD50
Also where is the plane that hit the pentagon? Show me a picture of a plane part at the scene.
September 3rd, 2009 at 3:11 pm
I say he is masking his true intentions because of the clip about him when he says that we won’t be able to get to single payer immediately and that it might take 10, 15 or 20 years.
This is in contrast to him more recently talking about how the public option is not a Trojan horse for a single payer system or government takeover of health care (however he words it).
I have not heard him say that he has changed his position and no longer supports the idea of a single payer system.
September 8th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
Well, here’s the facts: Obama didn’t campaign on single payer. He hasn’t said a word about it since 2003 (the clip you linked to).